Sadomasochism, Tradition, Devotion, Mysterious,
and Superstitious describe the article "Body Ritual of
the Nacerima", by Horace Miner.
Sadomasochism with a broad brush
basically represents someone who receives pleasure from acts of pain or humiliation.
The Nacerima as a people completely reflect that thought to me. Within the
article there are so many references of pain and humiliation and they are all interpreted
to Nacremia as rituals for purity. It seemed as though the people as a whole
have given all authority to medicine men, holy-mouth-men, and listeners, as the
dominant partner to their submissive in rituals that reflect an S&M relationship.
The author even makes this distinction when talking about The Nacerima going to
see the holy-mouth-men twice a year. He states, “One has to watch the gleam in
the eye of a holy-mouth-man, as he jabs an awl into an exposed nerve, to
suspect that a certain amount of sadism is involves".
Mysterious is the best way to describe
The Nacerima. Even though there is a lot of information in this article about
their rituals regarding the body and the mouth, the author makes it a point to
state that there still a need for more research. Just within the general drive
of a people in modern times to adhere to such rituals is a mystery. This was
actually the first thing I had thought of when I read the article. Their
rituals made me want to find out more about the people and there everyday
duties.
Part B
As an American, I realized that my choice of words might sound very harsh when taking out the name "Nacirema" and replacing it with "America". I still think that my words would still be relevant to the description provided. What ever the name might be, I think what I wrote about a certain group of people was very accurate. It actually made me think that maybe this is how other people around the world might view Americans. I don't think my words surprised me. I think I was just surprised that how easily transferable to myself it was. My views definitely exhibited ethnocentrism. Initially when I was reading the description I couldn't help to imagine some far off indigenous place, and by doing so I automatically started comparing a certain way of life that I had imagined to my life in the United States. Reading my blog again I realized that my words are biased and certain words I used completely reflects that. I used terms like sadomasochism and superstitious, that looking back now is not the most unbiased view. I assumed that when I was writing I was talking about some culture that had not yet been civilized. If maybe I had taken the word superstitious out and had put "religiously observant" it would have been a better way to describe a group of people. This was a great experience for me. I did not realize how much unintentional biased I had to what seemed as though a different culture. It is very important to remain free of personal judgment when viewing another culture. Especially in the field of Anthropology, it is crucial to remain free of personal judgment. The positions that Anthropologist take on any culture will be read and studied by many people, it is very important to remain free of judgment. I don't think that its completely possible to eliminate your personal views on anything. It is however, easier when you are able to understand that you do have personal opinions on the things you witness and are able to distinguish between your views and unbiased research.
I like the way you put it that the Nacerima people are superstious, and how they go about there ritual beliefs. Its an intising way to understanding what they are doing. For me it makes alot of sense that they are since what they are doing may be so unusally for us. thats rather a very good way of seening things. :)
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you when you stated that it is not "completely" possible to eliminate your personal views on other lifestyles besides our very own. I agree. It would be so hard in a society(quite very near to us) how they lead lives completely opposite on how we lead our lives.
ReplyDelete"It actually made me think that maybe this is how other people around the world might view Americans. "--- I think that this is one of the most important lessons in learning how to curb (and I say curb because I don't believe that it can be completely eliminated) the act of viewing different cultures with ethnocentrism. The ability to step out of one's own experience and look at it from another point of view can go a long way in coming to understand one's own culture, not just the one that we as anthropologists are studying. The ability to look at a culture, even the one that we live in, and not have to determine whether it is "right" or "wrong" or "good" or "bad" but just to observe the experience the members have in it will lead us to be more open-minded and tolerant witnesses. Like you said, knowing that we all have biases will help us to move past them.
ReplyDeleteExcellent introspective work on Part B! That was very well done. Loved the discussion and the exploration into your word choices.
ReplyDeleteI THOUGHT THE READING WAS ABOUT A UNCIVILIZED BUSH CULTURE! I REALLY LIT UP WHEN I READ YOUR STATEMENT "It actually made me think that maybe this is how other people around the world might view Americans." THAT STATEMENT HAD ME WONDERING HOW WE ARE VIEWED AND WHAT JUDGEMENT IS PLACED ON US TOO~!
ReplyDeleteGreat post Zhilbert, but - "I don't think that its completely possible to eliminate your personal views on anything" - I do think it is possible to completely become unbiased of personal opinion if you delve yourself into thinking analytically rather than personally. Whatever your background is, a culture can be pieced together if you just extensively examine that culture and map the reasons to why they are the way they are. Simply stepping in their shoes and ... almost psychically rationalizing their frame of mind can make you unbiased.
ReplyDeleteI commend you for admitting a mistake on your part. It takes a bit of time to realize that these are people too and not some fictitious group of people that we might see in a movie. I said in Part A that the group of people were persuasive and that was unbiased by looking at what they did and how they got other people to do the same also. It is possible to be unbiased, it just takes more thought than many people are used to I believe.
ReplyDelete